OUR VIEW: Vancity – Making Dreams Reality

With over 136,000 members living in Vancouver, $14.5 billion in assets and a presence in most of its 23 neighbourhoods, Vancity is a powerful force for shaping the city’s democratic, economic, social and environmental future.

And many Think City supporters can and should have a say in what Canada’s largest English-language credit union will do in coming years.

According to Vancity’s statement of values and commitments, the credit union has a goal of using its resources and expertise to effect positive change in Vancouver. In particular, it says it wants to leverage its skills and expertise as a financial institution to create solutions to social, environmental and economic issues.

Think City couldn’t agree more with the 64-year-old credit union’s desire for progressive change. That’s why we are launching our first Dream 15 community advocacy project. We want to engage all twelve Vancity board candidates in a dialogue about policy priorities, and see how these stack up against the policy priorities of Think City's supporters.

During the Dream Vancouver process, Think City supporters identified their top three civic public policy areas – affordable housing, transportation, and citizen involvement and engagement. We want to know what the Vancity board candidates believe the credit union should do to address these significant challenges facing Vancouver.

In terms of housing, Vancouver is the most expensive city in Canada when it comes to housing. Rents increased nearly 10 times faster than inflation in 2009, while the average first-time home buyer can only afford a $260,000 mortgage in a city where the typical house on the east side now costs $730,000. Can Vancity play a more active role in the creation of affordable housing?

Then there's transportation. Although transit ridership throughout Metro Vancouver rose by 38 per cent between 1998 and 2007, the number of trips by private vehicle also continued to grow across the region. In Vancouver, private vehicles account for half of all trips made.

Last October, municipal leaders including Mayor Robertson adopted a TransLink budget that capped road and transit operations at current levels, putting much-needed expansion of the transportation system on hold and undermining efforts to get people out of private vehicles over the next several years. Vancity's efforts to get its employees using public transit and its support of cycling are well-known, but can it do more?

Lastly, how can Vancity foster greater citizen involvement in civic life? The Vancouver Foundation’s 2008 Vital Signs citizen panel recommended that governments, businesses, non-profit agencies and other organizations pay more attention to public engagement programs, education and participation.

Think City will survey candidates on the three issue areas and post their responses on our web site starting Feb. 23 here. The 2010 Vancity board elections will take place from Feb. 23 to March 27 by mail and at branch locations.

After we complete this first test of the Dream 15 advocacy project, we hope to refine this project further so that we can weave in Dream 15 policy solutions into the long-term goals of other relevant member-run organizations. If you have a suggestion regarding other similar initiatives, please contact Think City here.

Membership has its privileges

Thanks for the invitation to join, but Think City and many of its supporters are already Vancity members.

Be sure to cast an informed ballot by reviewing the candidate survey results on our web site here http://www.thinkcity.ca/2010vancity_candidates.

Become a Member of Vancity to have a say....

As a member of Vancity, I directly have a say as to what this democratic financial institution does. I have accounts and have held mortgages and loans through Vancity. If anyone at ThinkCity desires to have a say in what Vancity does, I would invite them to become a member, do their banking their and take part in their yearly elections.

Whatever the perceived

Whatever the perceived problems are with an at-large system, at least more councilors are forced to look at the city in its entirety rather than what might be good for a particular ward. A ward system would generate a lot more horse trading and IOU obligations which in turn would require councilors to sacrifice the good of their wards when IOUs are called. Ward councilors with similar interests would be more likely to form cliques to secure things for their wards even if they were not in the interests of the city as a whole. We would have to fund mini bureaucracies in each ward. Each of these bureaucracies will need to distinguish themselves from other ward bureaucracies in order to have their councilors re-elected. Also because fiefdoms are smaller, it would be much easier for inexperienced people and lower caliber people to get themselves into positions of power to the considerable disadvantage of the entire city. Wards which end up with weaker or less 'political' representatives would be at a distinct disadvantage. Instead of the city functioning as a whole, we will have a lot of time wasted by councilors who need to demonstrate to their ward voters that they are getting 'results'. We absolutely don't need to fund more city government. We also don't need to pit neighborhoods against neighborhoods.

Good idea to talk to Van

Good idea to talk to Van City board members. Publicizing it prior to the vote for the boards is also good. Another financial institution you probably already know about that is member-owned is the CCEC Credit Union. It is at Commercial and ....7th I think. The initials stand for Community Congress for Economic Change. It is small, and it is part of the worldwide cooperative movement. Coast Capital comes to mind too, but I know much less about them. I've been a member of CCEC since 1976. Or earlier, I'm not sure!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.